Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now

How judges determine what constitutes oral testimony that establishes the existence of a writing and when a writing is sufiicient under the statute of frauds. Also noteworthy is the fact that oral testimony can be elicited that establishes the existence of a writing that would meet the requirements Lmder the statute of frauds. For example, testimony regarding an invoice for products sold, when the actual invoice is not produced, is enough in certain states to meet the requirements under the statute. Case I2-l demonstrates how judges determine what constitutes oral testimony that establishes the existence of a writing and when a writing is sufiicient under the statute of frauds.

How judges determine what constitutes oral testimony that establishes the existence of a writing and when a writing is sufiicient under the statute of frauds.

Also noteworthy is the fact that oral testimony can be elicited that establishes the existence of
a writing that would meet the requirements Lmder the statute of frauds. For example, testimony
regarding an invoice for products sold, when the actual invoice is not produced, is enough in
certain states to meet the requirements under the statute.

Case I2-l demonstrates how judges determine what constitutes oral testimony that establishes
the existence of a writing and when a writing is sufiicient under the statute of frauds.

Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now