Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now

Clinical Problem Summary with Annotated Bibliography Guidelines PURPOSE Each student will: 1. State clearly the PICO, clinical problem, and the clinical question. 2. Conduct a focused review of literature related to the identified clinical problem. 3. Apply evidenced based support (Level of evidence – A, B, and C) for clinical issue/problem. 4. Synthesize and summarize the literature concisely. COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome: CO 4: Summarize scientific knowledge to determine the nature and significance of a clinical problem at the microsystem level. REQUIREMENTS 1. An introduction and brief discussion of the PICO and clinical question. 2. An initial focused review of the literature related to the clinical problem. 3. Five annotated bibliographies (1 page each). 4. Synthesis and summarization of the evidence supporting the clinical problem (2-3 pages). 5. Reference list. DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Introduction 10 8% Choose a clinical problem identified at your workplace at the microsystem level. Identify your PICO and clinical question. Focused Review 0 0 Conduct a focused search of the literature at the College of Nursing Library, online electronic databases. You may choose to use library services at your workplace if you wish. Identify five professional peer-reviewed, scholarly, evidence-based articles that pertain to the clinical problem/clinical question. Annotated Bibliography 70 56% The annotated bibliography includes 5 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions) that support the clinical problem. Write an annotated bib on each of five original research articles that includes: • Paragraph 1: A paragraph on the application to the clinical problem. Identify area of interest related to clinical problem. Include the study purpose, design, subjects/type of sample, intervention, data collection, data analysis, findings. • Paragraph 2: A paragraph that summarizes the article. Relate the study findings, limitations, and implications for practice to support your clinical problem. Literature Review Summary 35 28% Literature Review is a 2-3 page paper that requires scholarly writing with a concise synthesis and summary of the reviewed articles submitted in the annotated bib. Appropriate citing of original research required (no secondary cites accepted). The summary includes (2-3 pages): 1. An introduction to the literature review. 2. Body of Paper– Synthesize the 5 annotated bib concisely and relate to the clinical problem 3. A summary paragraph that supports the clinical problem in the microsystem/workplace. Appropriate citing of original research (no secondary sources accepted) using APA Style/Formatting. Reference List 5 4% Reference List (according to APA Style) includes the original reference of the research article reviewed in the annotated bibliography. A minimum of 5 scholarly research articles. APA Style/Formatting 5 4% Concise, brief synthesis and summarizing is the goal. Formatting according to APA 6th edition style is required. Please refer to the APA Publication Manual for assistance. Total 125 pts 100% A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Introduction (10 pts) One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question. 10-9 points Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic 8-6 points Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present = 0 points 5-0 points Focused Review (0 pts) Conduct initial focused search of clinical problem using College or workplace library services. Identify five professional peer reviewed scholarly evidence based articles that pertain to the clinical problem/clinical question. REQUIRED, no points Annotated Bibliography (14 pts per article, total of 70 pts) Include 5 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions) that support the clinical problem. Write an annotated bib on each of five original research articles that included a paragraph on the application to the clinical problem, and a paragraph that summarized the article. 14-12 points per annotation Either Included only 4 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions); or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bib on each of 4-5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects. 11-8 points per annotation Either included less than 4 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions); or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bib on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate. 7-0 points per annotation Literature Review Summary (35 pts) Scholarly writing with concise summary of the reviewed articles submitted in the annotated bib. The summary includes: 1. An introduction to the literature review. 2. Body of paper – Synthesize the 5 annotated bib concisely, relate to the clinical problem. 3. A summary paragraph that supports the clinical problem in the workplace. Appropriate citing of original research (no secondary sources accepted) using APA Style/Formatting. 35-32 points The scholarly writing is adequate but lacking in some areas of synthesis and/or support of the clinical problem. 1. The introduction is incomplete or vague 2. Body of paper – The synthesis could be more clear and precise in its relationship to the clinical problem. 3. The summary partially supports the clinical problem in the workplace. Inappropriate citing of original research or inappropriate sources using APA Style/Formatting 31-25 points The scholarly writing is not adequate and is lacking in many areas of synthesis and/or support of the clinical problem. 1. The introduction does not adequately introduce the literature review. 2. Body of paper –Inadequate synthesis of the 5 annotated bib, inability to relate the bib to the clinical problem 3. The summary does not support the clinical problem in the workplace. Many errors in the citing of original research and/or many errors using APA Style/Formatting 24-0 points Reference List (5 pts) A minimum of 5 scholarly research articles 5-4 points A minimum of 3 scholarly research articles correctly referenced. 3-2 points Less than 3 scholarly articles correctly referenced. 1-0 points APA format (5 pts) APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors. 5-4 points 3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing. 3-2 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 1-0 points Total Points Possible = points

Clinical Problem Summary with Annotated Bibliography Guidelines
PURPOSE
Each student will:
1. State clearly the PICO, clinical problem, and the clinical question.
2. Conduct a focused review of literature related to the identified clinical problem.
3. Apply evidenced based support (Level of evidence – A, B, and C) for clinical issue/problem.
4. Synthesize and summarize the literature concisely.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:
CO 4: Summarize scientific knowledge to determine the nature and significance of a clinical problem at the microsystem level.

REQUIREMENTS
1. An introduction and brief discussion of the PICO and clinical question.
2. An initial focused review of the literature related to the clinical problem.
3. Five annotated bibliographies (1 page each).
4. Synthesis and summarization of the evidence supporting the clinical problem (2-3 pages).
5. Reference list.
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA
Category Points % Description
Introduction 10 8% Choose a clinical problem identified at your workplace at the microsystem level. Identify your PICO and clinical question.
Focused Review 0 0 Conduct a focused search of the literature at the College of Nursing Library, online electronic databases. You may choose to use library services at your workplace if you wish.
Identify five professional peer-reviewed, scholarly, evidence-based articles that pertain to the clinical problem/clinical question.
Annotated Bibliography 70 56% The annotated bibliography includes 5 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions) that support the clinical problem. Write an annotated bib on each of five original research articles that includes:
• Paragraph 1: A paragraph on the application to the clinical problem. Identify area of interest related to clinical problem. Include the study purpose, design, subjects/type of sample, intervention, data collection, data analysis, findings.
• Paragraph 2: A paragraph that summarizes the article. Relate the study findings, limitations, and implications for practice to support your clinical problem.
Literature Review Summary 35 28% Literature Review is a 2-3 page paper that requires scholarly writing with a concise synthesis and summary of the reviewed articles submitted in the annotated bib. Appropriate citing of original research required (no secondary cites accepted).
The summary includes (2-3 pages):
1. An introduction to the literature review.
2. Body of Paper– Synthesize the 5 annotated bib concisely and relate to the clinical problem
3. A summary paragraph that supports the clinical problem in the microsystem/workplace.
Appropriate citing of original research (no secondary sources accepted) using APA Style/Formatting.
Reference List 5 4% Reference List (according to APA Style) includes the original reference of the research article reviewed in the annotated bibliography. A minimum of 5 scholarly research articles.
APA Style/Formatting 5 4% Concise, brief synthesis and summarizing is the goal. Formatting according to APA 6th edition style is required. Please refer to the APA Publication Manual for assistance.
Total 125 pts 100%
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria
Introduction
(10 pts) One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question.

10-9 points Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic

8-6 points Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present = 0 points

5-0 points
Focused Review
(0 pts) Conduct initial focused search of clinical problem using College or workplace library services.
Identify five professional peer reviewed scholarly evidence based articles that pertain to the clinical problem/clinical question.

REQUIRED, no points
Annotated Bibliography
(14 pts per article, total of 70 pts) Include 5 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions) that support the clinical problem. Write an annotated bib on each of five original research articles that included a paragraph on the application to the clinical problem, and a paragraph that summarized the article.

14-12 points per annotation Either Included only 4 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions); or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bib on each of 4-5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects.

11-8 points per annotation Either included less than 4 scholarly original references on particular research studies (not topic or opinions); or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bib on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate.

7-0 points per annotation
Literature Review Summary
(35 pts) Scholarly writing with concise summary of the reviewed articles submitted in the annotated bib. The summary includes:
1. An introduction to the literature review.
2. Body of paper – Synthesize the 5 annotated bib concisely, relate to the clinical problem.
3. A summary paragraph that supports the clinical problem in the workplace.
Appropriate citing of original research (no secondary sources accepted) using APA Style/Formatting.

35-32 points The scholarly writing is adequate but lacking in some areas of synthesis and/or support of the clinical problem.
1. The introduction is incomplete or vague
2. Body of paper – The synthesis could be more clear and precise in its relationship to the clinical problem.
3. The summary partially supports the clinical problem in the workplace.
Inappropriate citing of original research or inappropriate sources using APA Style/Formatting

31-25 points The scholarly writing is not adequate and is lacking in many areas of synthesis and/or support of the clinical problem.
1. The introduction does not adequately introduce the literature review.
2. Body of paper –Inadequate synthesis of the 5 annotated bib, inability to relate the bib to the clinical problem
3. The summary does not support the clinical problem in the workplace.
Many errors in the citing of original research and/or many errors using APA Style/Formatting

24-0 points
Reference List
(5 pts) A minimum of 5 scholarly research articles

5-4 points A minimum of 3 scholarly research articles correctly referenced.

3-2 points Less than 3 scholarly articles correctly referenced.

1-0 points
APA format
(5 pts) APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.

5-4 points 3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.

3-2 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.

1-0 points
Total Points Possible = points

Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now