Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now

As discussed in the Week 7 Lecture, Justices Breyer and Ginsberg come at the purpose of Article I, Section 8 from entirely different perspectives. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg maintains that the general purpose of the clause is to promote the dissemination of existing and future works. Justice Stephen Breyer takes an opposing view – that the purpose is to promote the production of new works. Who do you think has the right side of the argument, and why?

As discussed in the Week 7 Lecture, Justices Breyer and Ginsberg come at the purpose of Article I, Section 8 from entirely different perspectives. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg maintains that the general purpose of the clause is to promote the dissemination of existing and future works. Justice Stephen Breyer takes an opposing view – that the purpose is to promote the production of new works.

Who do you think has the right side of the argument, and why?

 

Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper

Order Now